Regression, matching, control function and instrumental variables methods for recovering the effect of education on individual earnings are reviewed for single treatments and sequential multiple treatments with and without heterogeneous returns. The sensitivity of the estimates once applied to a common data set is then explored. We show the importance of correcting for detailed test score and family background differences and of allowing for (observable) heterogeneity in returns. We find an average return of 27% for those completing higher education versus anything less. Compared with stopping at 16 years of age without qualifications, we find an average return to O-levels of 18%, to A-levels of 24% and to higher education of 48%.
Find the working paper here.
Authors
Lorraine Dearden
CPP Co-Director
Richard is Co-Director of the Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP) and Senior Research Fellow at IFS.
Barbara Sianesi
Journal article details
- Publisher
- Royal Statistical Society
- Issue
- July 2005
Suggested citation
R, Blundell and L, Dearden and B, Sianesi. (2005). 'Evaluating the effect of education on earnings: models, methods and results from the National Child Development Survey' (2005)
More from IFS
Understand this issue
Sure Start achieved its aims, then we threw it away
15 April 2024
Scottish Budget 2024-25: IFS analysis
A mess has been made of Child Benefit, and the clear-up operation may not be easy
29 March 2024
Policy analysis
The short- and medium-term impacts of Sure Start on educational outcomes
9 April 2024
Sure Start greatly improved disadvantaged children’s GCSE results
9 April 2024
What you need to know about the new childcare entitlements
28 March 2024
Academic research
Parental beliefs, perceived health risks, and time investment in children
15 April 2024
Higher Education Access and Funding: challenges and policy options
Imagine your life at 25: Gender conformity and later-life outcomes
24 April 2024