The theoretical analysis of tax progressivity has proceeded on the unrealistic assumption that tax liability is never zero, thereby precluding a systematic examination of the progressivity effects of such basic tax reforms as an increase in personal allowances. This paper extends the core results on progressivity to cover zero tax payments, and applies these new results to the analysis of allowances, deductions and credits. Log concavity of the tax schedule a property quite distinct from any notion of progressivity emerges as the critical determinant of whether liability progression rises uniformly as allowances are increased, and it is shown that any variation in averagae tax rates is sufficient to admit the possibility that residual progression is reduced by an increase in either allowances, income-related deductions, or tax credits.
Authors
Research Associate University of Tokyo
Mick is a Ushioda Fellow at Tokyo College, University of Tokyo and a Research Associate at IFS.
Henry Papapanagos
Anthony Shorrocks
Working Paper details
- DOI
- 10.1920/wp.ifs.1996.9617
- Publisher
- IFS
Suggested citation
M, Keen and H, Papapanagos and A, Shorrocks. (1996). Progressivity effects of structural income tax reforms. London: IFS. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/progressivity-effects-structural-income-tax-reforms (accessed: 14 May 2024).
More from IFS
Understand this issue
Where next for the state pension?
13 December 2023
Social mobility and wealth
12 December 2023
Autumn Statement 2023: IFS analysis
23 November 2023
Policy analysis
The past and future of UK health spending
14 May 2024
Recent trends in and the outlook for health-related benefits
19 April 2024
Progression of nurses within the NHS
12 April 2024
Academic research
The role of hospital networks in individual mortality
13 May 2024
Forced displacement, mental health, and child development: Evidence from Rohingya refugees
10 May 2024
Leveraging edutainment and social networks to foster interethnic harmony
10 May 2024