Interventions that aim to change outcomes for women and children typically target women. Yet in contexts where men are the dominant decision-makers, male preferences and beliefs may remain the binding constraint. We ask – when we target men, women or both, with the same intervention in the same context – how their information and beliefs about private and social returns, versus their power to change household outcomes, trade off. We conduct a cluster-randomized control trial of an edutainment intervention aimed at delaying marriage of adolescent children in rural Pakistan. Our treatment arms target men and boys, women and girls, or both. We find that targeting men, or both genders jointly, significantly reduces child marriage of girls in targeted households. Underlying this, we show that whenever men are treated, they focus on private returns to the household; whenever women are treated, they focus on both private and social returns; and only when both genders are treated jointly, does the focus on social returns also become salient to men.
Authors
Research Associate World Bank
Rachel Cassidy is a Research Associate of the IFS and a Research Economist at the World Bank's Africa Gender Innovation Lab.
Anaya Dam
Utrecht University School of Economics
Amsterdam Institute for International Development
Umair Kiani
Centre for Economic Research in Pakistan
Karlijn Morsink
Utrecht University School of Economics
Working Paper details
- DOI
- 10.1920/wp.ifs.2022.5022
- Publisher
- Institute for Fiscal Studies
Suggested citation
Cassidy, R et al. (2022). Father of the bride, or steel magnolias? Targeting men, women or both to reduce child marriage. 22/50. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/father-bride-or-steel-magnolias-targeting-men-women-or-both-reduce-child-marriage (accessed: 9 May 2024).
More from IFS
Understand this issue
Sure Start achieved its aims, then we threw it away
15 April 2024
Behind the numbers: reassessing investment in skills and training
12 October 2023
If you can’t see it, you can’t be it: role models influence female junior doctors’ choice of medical specialty
24 April 2024
Policy analysis
What you need to know about the new childcare entitlements
28 March 2024
The short- and medium-term impacts of Sure Start on educational outcomes
9 April 2024
Sure Start greatly improved disadvantaged children’s GCSE results
9 April 2024
Academic research
The unintended consequences of infrastructure development
8 May 2024
Imagine your life at 25: Gender conformity and later-life outcomes
24 April 2024
A senior doctor like me: Gender match and occupational choice
24 April 2024