Non-participation in the Employment Retention and Advancement study: implications for the experimental first-year impact estimates

  • Barbara Sianesi

Published on 1 March 2010

The aim of this report is to explore how the findings from the experimental research on ERA relate to the impacts that would have been experienced, on average, by all the people who were eligible for the programme, had they participated in the study.

The Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) programme has been evaluated by random assignment. Over one-quarter of the eligible New Deal population was, however, not represented in the experiment. The aim of this report is to explore how the findings from the experimental research relate to the impacts that would have been experienced, on average, by all the people who were eligible for the programme, had they participated in the study.

Authors

Person graphic

Barbara Sianesi

Report details

ISBN
978-1-84712-7044
Publisher
Department for Work and Pensions

Suggested citation

Sianesi, B. (2010). Non-participation in the Employment Retention and Advancement study: implications for the experimental first-year impact estimates. London: Department for Work and Pensions. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/non-participation-employment-retention-and-advancement-study-implications-experimental (accessed: 26 April 2024).

Related documents

More from IFS

Understand this issue

Policy analysis

Academic research