To understand the role of evidence in tax policy design, this paper organizes the empirical analysis of reform under five loosely related headings: (i) key margins of adjustment, (ii) measurement of effective tax rates, (iii) the importance of information and complexity, (iv) evidence on the size of responses, and (v) implications from theory for tax design. The context for the discussion is the recently published Mirrlees Review of tax reform. Although the Review focused on all aspects of tax reform, this paper highlights the taxation of earnings. It also comments on earnings taxation in the context of VAT base-broadening reforms and the taxation of capital.
Authors
CPP Co-Director
Richard is Co-Director of the Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP) and Senior Research Fellow at IFS.
Journal article details
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01054.x
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Issue
- Volume 10, Issue 1, December 2011, pages 43-77
Suggested citation
Blundell, R. (2011). 'Tax Policy Reform: The Role of Empirical Evidence' 10, Issue 1(2011), pp.43–77.
More from IFS
Understand this issue
Spring Budget 2024: What you need to know
7 March 2024
The £600 billion problem awaiting the next government
25 April 2024
A mess has been made of Child Benefit, and the clear-up operation may not be easy
29 March 2024
Policy analysis
Recent trends in and the outlook for health-related benefits
19 April 2024
4.2 million working-age people now claiming health-related benefits, could rise by 30% by the end of the decade
19 April 2024
Oil and gas make Scotland’s underlying public finances particularly volatile and uncertain
27 March 2024
Academic research
Intertemporal income shifting and the taxation of business owner-managers
24 January 2024
Insurance, redistribution, and the inequality of lifetime income
2 November 2023
The menopause "penalty"
18 March 2024