The use of self-assessed health status (SAHS) as a measure of health is common in empirical research. We analyse a unique Australian survey in which a random sub-sample of respondents answer a standard self-assessed health question twice—before and after an additional set of health related questions. A total of 28% of respondents change their reported health status. Response reliability is related to age, income and occupation. We also compare the responses of these individuals to other respondents who are queried only once, to isolate effects of question order and mode of administration.
Authors
Research Fellow University of Michigan
Tom is a Research Fellow at IFS, a Research Professor for the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan.
Steven Kennedy
Journal article details
- DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00007-3
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Issue
- Volume 21, July 2002
Suggested citation
Crossley, T and Kennedy, S. (2002). 'The Reliability of Self Assessed Health Status' 21(2002)
More from IFS
Understand this issue
Council funding is a numbers game in which everybody is losing
13 May 2024
Empty defence spending promises are a shot in the dark
29 April 2024
Public investment: what you need to know
25 April 2024
Policy analysis
The past and future of UK health spending
14 May 2024
NHS spending has risen less quickly than was planned at the last election, despite the pandemic and record waiting lists
14 May 2024
Recent trends in and the outlook for health-related benefits
19 April 2024
Academic research
The employment and distributional impacts of nationwide minimum wage changes
10 April 2024
Willingness to pay for improved public education and public healthcare systems: the role of income mobility prospects
14 March 2024
Unfunded mandates and taxation
14 March 2024