Follow us
Publications Commentary Research People Events News Resources and Videos About IFS
Home Publications Improving CLTS targeting: evidence from Nigeria

Improving CLTS targeting: evidence from Nigeria

Laura Abramovsky, Britta Augsburg, Erin Flynn and Francisco Oteiza
Briefing note

Many low-income countries face the hefty challenge of increasing sanitation coverage, in both rural and urban areas, which demand di fferent solutions. In response, governments, with support from international agencies, bilateral donors and non-government organisations, are deploying a range of programmes and policies to accelerate progress towards the new global goals. Community-led total sanitation (CLTS) is one popular approach. CLTS works with an entire community to identify the negative e ffects of poor sanitation, especially the practice of open defecation, and empowers them to collectively find solutions. CLTS is understood to be more suitable for small, rural and homogeneous communities, however it is still considered an appropriate solution for more urbanised areas.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies and WaterAid have co-authored this brief which provides quantitative evidence to support this conjecture and bring forward a simple rule of thumb that allows more efficient programme targeting. We suggest that using this information can improve the targeting of CLTS in Nigeria, and possibly other countries, freeing up scarce resources to identify and test complementary sanitation approaches suitable for more urbanised communities.

Please also see WaterAid's blog: CLTS in urbanised areas: is it time to stop tweaking and start targeting?



Find out more

Newspaper article
In November last year, Nigeria declared that its water supply, sanitation and hygiene sector was in crisis. A community-level intervention aims to reduce open defecation and improve toilet coverage. So why does it work in some places and not others?