Follow us
Publications Commentary Research People Events News Resources and Videos About IFS
Home Publications Higher education funding policy: a guide to the debate

Higher education funding policy: a guide to the debate

Briefing note
This Election Briefing Note compares Labour's proposed reforms to the system of higher education (HE) finance in England and the alternative proposals outlined by the Conservative Party in September 2004 and the Liberal Democrats in January and March 2005.

At their root, all of the parties' proposals aim to increase the level of funding per university student. But the ways in which this will be achieved are very different. This has implications for how well off students will be and how well off future graduates will be, and will also have implications for universities and the taxpayer. All of these issues are explored in this Note.

The structure of the Note is as follows: Section 2 sets out the key features of the three partiesҍ HE funding policies; Section 3 describes how the numbers behind the different proposals add up, setting out the implications for taxpayers, universities, students and graduates; Section 4 sets out what the figures mean for university funding on a per-student basis, some distributional implications for universities and an international comparison; Section 5 provides an assessment of what the reforms would mean for the living standards of students whilst at university, and what levels of debt students are likely to graduate with under different funding systems; Section 6 gives an in-depth examination of the impact of different HE funding policies on graduates across the entire distribution of likely future graduate earnings paths; and Section 7 concludes.

More on this topic

Almost all the candidates in the Conservative leadership election have promised higher levels of spending on education. With a Spending Review of some form due this year, we analyse the cost of potential commitments on schools and education spending.
How is local government funding changing? And what might the implications for children's services be? In this presentation for the Office of the Children's Commissioner of England, IFS Associate Director David Phillips looked at the trends in local government spending over time, across the country, ...
Press release
Children from poorer backgrounds now have more spent on their education than do those from better-off families.