'Study now, pay later' or 'HE for free'? An assessment of alternative proposals for higher education finance

Published on 1 June 2003

In this commentary, IFS compares the reforms proposed by the two parties, looking at the effect on student and graduate finances, the distributional impact on households with different incomes, and the cost to the Exchequer and taxpayers in general.

Downloads

Image representing the file: comm94.pdf

comm94.pdf

PDF | 1.45 MB

This Commentary examines the government's proposed reforms to the system of higher education (HE) finance in England set out in its recent White Paper, comparing the reforms with the alternative proposals outlined by the Conservative Party in May.

Authors

Alissa Goodman
Alissa Goodman

Research Fellow University College London

Alissa is an IFS Research Fellow and a Professor of Economics and Director of the Centre for Longitudinal Studies at the UCL Institute of Education.

Greg Kaplan
Greg Kaplan

Research Fellow University of Chicago

Greg is a Professor at the University of Chicago in the Kenneth C. Griffin Department of Economics and a Research Fellow at the IFS.

Report details

DOI
10.1920/co.ifs.2003.0094
ISBN
978-1-903274-33-0
Publisher
IFS

Suggested citation

Goodman, A and Kaplan, G. (2003). 'Study now, pay later' or 'HE for free'? An assessment of alternative proposals for higher education finance. London: IFS. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/study-now-pay-later-or-he-free-assessment-alternative-proposals-higher-education (accessed: 25 April 2024).

Press release

More from IFS

Understand this issue

Policy analysis

Academic research