This paper has been written as a review of the current tax treatment of the family in the UK.

This Discussion Paper provides detailed consideration of selected existing corporate tax legislation concerning schedule A, the antiavoidance rules for companies and the rules for group relief set out in schedule 18 TA 1988.

This Discussion Paper provides detailed consideration of selected existing corporate tax legislation concerning schedule A, the antiavoidance rules for companies and the rules for group relief set out in schedule 18 TA 1988.

Earlier this year the TLRC responded to the consultation by the Inland Revenue and HM Treasury on corporation tax reform including aligning the corporate tax system more closely with accounts.

The TLRC Committee has been considering the relationship between tax and accounting measures of business income. This paper builds on the earlier discussion paper DP2 issued in April 2002, which set out some of the general issues of principle involved in any such alignment. The government is clearly attracted to aligning the corporate tax system more closely with account, and significant legislative advances in this direction have already been achieved. As a general matter this is to be welcomed, for reasons which are examined in this paper. But an examination of the principles involved leads us to conclude that now is the time to reflect on where the limits to alignment might lie. It is with this question in mind that Graeme Macdonald and Martin have written this paper at the request of the Committee as a response to the August 2003 consultation document, Corporation Tax Reform.

The TLRC Committee has been considering the relationship between tax and accounting measures of business income. This paper builds on the earlier discussion paper DP2 issued in April 2002, which set out some of the general issues of principle involved in any such alignment. The government is clearly attracted to aligning the corporate tax system more closely with account, and significant legislative advances in this direction have already been achieved. As a general matter this is to be welcomed, for reasons which are examined in this paper. But an examination of the principles involved leads us to conclude that now is the time to reflect on where the limits to alignment might lie. It is with this question in mind that Graeme Macdonald and Martin have written this paper at the request of the Committee as a response to the August 2003 consultation document, Corporation Tax Reform.

This is a response by the Tax Law Review Committee of the Institute for Fiscal Studies to the invitation to comment on the questions raised in the consultation paper on civil partnerships.

This is a response by the Tax Law Review Committee of the Institute for Fiscal Studies to the invitation to comment on the questions raised in the consultation paper on civil partnerships.

In December 2001, the TLRC established a working party under the Chairmanship of Sir Alan Budd. The Working Party's terms of reference were Ӕo review the institutional processes for the Parliamentary scrutiny of tax proposals and for the enactment of tax legislation and to consider whether changes to those processes would promote simplification and improve the quality of tax legislation and, if so, what the nature of those institutional changes should be.Ԡ This Reports sets out the working party's conclusions.

In December 2001, the TLRC established a working party under the Chairmanship of Sir Alan Budd. The Working Party's terms of reference were Ӕo review the institutional processes for the Parliamentary scrutiny of tax proposals and for the enactment of tax legislation and to consider whether changes to those processes would promote simplification and improve the quality of tax legislation and, if so, what the nature of those institutional changes should be.Ԡ This Reports sets out the working party's conclusions.