Savers face a complex and changing array of different tax treatments. These differences are big and can make the cost of choosing the ‘wrong’ savings vehicle very large. In addition apparently small differences in fees and charges can outweigh the effects of different tax treatments. Meanwhile pension auto-enrolment arrangements, which compel matching contributions from employers, will make saving through pensions auto-enrolment much more attractive than almost any other option with the same underlying return.
These are among the main findings of new work by IFS researchers on how taxes and charges can affect the attractiveness of different forms of savings.
Authors
Senior Economist
Stuart is a Senior Economist working in the Tax sector, and focuses on analysing the design of the tax and benefit system.
Research Fellow Financial Conduct Authority
Jonathan is a Research Fellow at the IFS and a Technical Specialist in the Economics Department at the Financial Conduct Authority.
Press Release details
- Publisher
- IFS
More from IFS
Understand this issue
IFS Deputy Director Carl Emmerson made a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences
4 March 2024
Statement on Alistair Darling's passing
4 December 2023
IFS contributor Claudia Goldin wins Nobel Prize in economics
9 October 2023
Policy analysis
4.2 million working-age people now claiming health-related benefits, could rise by 30% by the end of the decade
19 April 2024
Sure Start greatly improved disadvantaged children’s GCSE results
9 April 2024
Gap between higher- and lower-paid public sector workers falls by more than a third since 2007 as doctors and experienced teachers have faced unprecedented pay cuts
26 March 2024
Academic research
Itay Saporta Eksten visits IFS
31 January 2024
IFS co-organises Paris-London Public Economics Conference 2023
24 November 2023
Imran Rasul elected as EEA Vice-President
21 November 2023