Facts and figures about UK taxes, benefits and public spending.
Income distribution, poverty and inequality.
Analysing government fiscal forecasts and tax and spending.
Analysis of the fiscal choices an independent Scotland would face.
Case studies that give a flavour of the areas where IFS research has an impact on society.
Reforming the tax system for the 21st century.
A peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing articles by academics and practitioners.
|
Type: External publications Authors: Stuart Adam and James Browne
Published in: British Politics and Policy at LSE blog
Stuart Adam and James Browne argue that the advantages of localising council tax rebate schemes seem to be strongly outweighed by the disadvantages; for instance, it will be difficult to design replacement schemes that protect the vulnerable while maintaining work incentives in the context of reduced funding. With 5.9 million recipients, Council Tax Benefit (CTB) is more widely claimed than any other means-tested benefit or tax credit. The UK government is proposing to abolish CTB across Britain from 2013-14 and give local authorities in England, and the Scottish and Welsh governments, grants to create their own systems for rebating council tax to low-income families - though pensioners in England will have to be fully protected. These grants will be based on 90 per cent of what would have been spent on CTB in each area. In a recent report we examine the likely effects of this policy and the options available to councils. Search |

