Downloads
wp1109.pdf
PDF | 692.36 KB
In this research, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, we merge detailed household level expenditure data from older households with historical local weather information. We then test for a heat or eat trade off: do households cut back on food spending to finance the additional cost of keeping warm during cold shocks? We find evidence that the poorest of older households are unable to smooth spending over the worst temperature shocks. Statistically significant reductions in food spending are observed in response to temperatures two or more standard deviations colder than expected (which occur about one winter month in forty) and reductions in food expenditure are considerably larger in poorer households.
Authors
Laura Blow
Research Fellow University of Michigan
Tom is a Research Fellow at IFS, a Research Professor for the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan.
Research Associate University of Minnesota
Working Paper details
- DOI
- 10.1920/wp.ifs.2011.1109
- Publisher
- IFS
Suggested citation
T, Beatty and L, Blow and T, Crossley. (2011). Is there a "heat or eat" trade-off in the UK?. London: IFS. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/there-heat-or-eat-trade-uk (accessed: 20 April 2024).
More from IFS
Understand this issue
Sure Start achieved its aims, then we threw it away
15 April 2024
Should we worry about government debt?
11 April 2024
A mess has been made of Child Benefit, and the clear-up operation may not be easy
29 March 2024
Policy analysis
Recent trends in and the outlook for health-related benefits
19 April 2024
4.2 million working-age people now claiming health-related benefits, could rise by 30% by the end of the decade
19 April 2024
Living standards since the last election
21 March 2024
Academic research
Labour market inequality and the changing life cycle profile of male and female wages
15 April 2024
The menopause "penalty"
18 March 2024
There and back again: women’s marginal commuting costs
2 April 2024