Facts and figures about UK taxes, benefits and public spending.
Income distribution, poverty and inequality.
Analysing government fiscal forecasts and tax and spending.
Analysis of the fiscal choices an independent Scotland would face.
Case studies that give a flavour of the areas where IFS research has an impact on society.
Reforming the tax system for the 21st century.
A peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing articles by academics and practitioners.
|
Type: IFS Working Papers Authors: Kakwani, N and Lambert, P ISSN: 1742-0415
A new procedure for measuring horizontal inequity and vertical equity in the income tax is proposed, for which the "equals" under the tax law are socioeconomic groups, and the equal treatment norm is a command that, for equity, these groups should face the same tax schedule. The measures proposed capture the welfare effects of systematic tax discrimination between groups. Horizontal inequity is measured by the dollar value of the welfare loss caused whenever there is tax discrimination between groups. Vertical equity is measured as the dollar value of the welfare gain which comes from the unequal treatment of people at different pre-tax income levels - both between and within the groups. Horizontal inequity is thereby the increment to vertical equity that could be achieved if tax discrimination were eliminated. A distributional judgement parameter is incorporated to take account to be taken of different attitudes to inequality on the part of the social evaluator. The new approach enables answers to be given to many topical questions concerning the way the income tax operates. This is illustrated by an application to Australian data, to investigate whether, and to what extent, the Australian income tax discriminates against wage and salary earners; it caused a roughly one percent loss of social welfare in 1984.
Search |
View all IFS Working Papers in the series
Recent IFS Working Papers
Identifying the drivers of month of birth differences in educational attainment
This paper is the first to apply the principle of maximum entropy to the month of birth problem.
The drivers of month of birth differences in children's cognitive and non-cognitive skills: a regression discontinuity analysis
This paper uses data from a rich UK birth cohort to estimate the differences in cognitive and non-cognitive skills between children born at the start and end of the academic year.
The impact of age within academic year on adult outcomes
We provide the first evidence on whether differences in childhood outcomes translate into differences in the probability of employment, occupation and earnings for adults in the UK.
|


