Facts and figures about UK taxes, benefits and public spending.
Income distribution, poverty and inequality.
Analysing government fiscal forecasts and tax and spending.
Analysis of the fiscal choices an independent Scotland would face.
Case studies that give a flavour of the areas where IFS research has an impact on society.
Reforming the tax system for the 21st century.
A peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing articles by academics and practitioners.
|
Type: IFS Reports Authors: Robert Chote, Carl Emmerson and Jonathan Shaw (eds)
ISBN: 978-1-903274-72-9 IFS member price: £25 Non-member price: £50
SUMMARYChapter 1: THE UK'S PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY: SURVEYING THE DAMAGE1.1 Introduction Chapter 2: FISCAL TIGHTENING: WHY AND HOW?2.1 Introduction Chapter 3: FISCAL STIMULUS AND THE CONSUMER3.1 Introduction Chapter 4: THE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK4.1 Introduction Chapter 5: THE PUBLIC FINANCES AND STERLING5.1 Introduction Chapter 6: GREEN BUDGET PUBLIC FINANCE FORECASTS6.1 Introduction Chapter 7: OPTIONS FOR FISCAL TIGHTENING: TAX INCREASES AND BENEFIT CUTS7.1 Introduction Chapter 8: PUBLIC SERVICES: DEEP CUTS COMING8.1 Introduction Chapter 9: PUBLIC SECTOR PAY AND PENSIONS9.1 Introduction Chapter 10: SUPPORT FOR RESEARCH AND INNOVATION10.1 Introduction Chapter 11: REFORMING UK FISCAL INSTITUTIONS11.1 Introduction APPENDICESAppendix A: Forecasting public finances © The Institute for Fiscal Studies, January 2010 Search |
Presentations from the event: Government departments used IFS research to inform decision-marking about a temporary cut in VAT.
Past research into pension reform has contributed to evidence given to government on public service pensions.
Public spending analysis stokes public debate and prompts increased transparency over government’s plans for spending cuts.
IFS researchers have evaluated whether the temporary VAT cut was able to boost the economy effectively.
IFS researchers used knowledge from past findings to analyse the potential impact of a proposed reduction in corporation tax to encourage innovation.
IFS arguments for independent official fiscal forecasts contributed to the government’s decision to set up an Office for Budget Responsibility.
|

