 Facts and figures about UK taxes, benefits and public spending.
Analysing government fiscal forecasts and tax and spending.
Case studies that give a flavour of the areas where IFS research has an impact on society.
Reforming the tax system for the 21st century.
A peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing articles by academics and practitioners.
Find out where you are in the income distribution.
Resources for schools and students.
|
Type: Journal Articles Authors: Barbara Sianesi ISSN: 0927-5371
Published in: Labour Economics
Volume, issue, pages: Vol. 15, No. 3, pp 370-499
JEL classification: C14, J38, J65, J68 Keywords: Evaluation; multiple treatments; propensity score matching; treatment effects
Previous version: IFS Working Papers [Details]
The differential performance of six Swedish active labour market programs for the unemployed is investigated in terms of short- and long-term employment probability and unemployment-benefit dependency. Both relative to one another and compared to more intense job search, the central finding is that the more similar to a regular job, the more effective a program is for its participants. Employment subsidies perform best by far, followed by trainee replacement and, by a long stretch, labour market training. Relief work and two types of work practice schemes appear by contrast to be mainly used to re-qualify for unemployment benefits. Search |
IFS publications are made available free of charge online wherever possible. If you would like to make a donation to IFS to help support our research, you can donate via Just Giving.
|
|
© The Institute for Fiscal Studies
Limited by Guarantee,Registered in England: 954616 7 Ridgmount Street London WC1E 7AE Registered Charity: 258815 VAT no: GB 394 5830 17 |
||||||
