Facts and figures about UK taxes, benefits and public spending.
Income distribution, poverty and inequality.
Analysing government fiscal forecasts and tax and spending.
Analysis of the fiscal choices an independent Scotland would face.
Case studies that give a flavour of the areas where IFS research has an impact on society.
Reforming the tax system for the 21st century.
A peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing articles by academics and practitioners.
|
Type: Presentations Authors: Andreas Haufler and Marco Runkel
JEL classification: H73, H25, F23 Keywords: Thin capitalization, capital structure, tax competition
Press release: Taxes and the location of corporate headquarters
We set up a model where two countries compete for internationally mobile firms through statutory tax rates and thin capitalization rules that limit the tax-deductibility of internal debt flows within multinational enterprises. Moreover, both multinational and domestic firms can respond to a higher domestic tax rate by increasing the level of external debt finance. For the case of identical countries we show that tax competition leads to inefficiently low tax rates and inefficiently lax thin capitalization rules. A coordinated tightening of thin capitalization rules will benefit both countries, even though it intensifies competition via statutory tax rates. If countries differ substantially in the number of domestic firms, however, then a coordination of thin capitalization rules may reduce welfare in the country with the larger domestic tax base. Search |

