<p>The Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) study can provide unbiased estimates of the impact of ERA only for that subset of the eligibles who were offered the possibility of taking part in the experiment and who agreed to do so. This report explores, in detail, how representative of the full eligible population the ERA study participants are by first documenting the incidence of non-participation and then testing for the presence of any systematic differences between non-participants and participants in terms of observed characteristics and subsequent outcomes.</p>
Authors
Research Fellow University College London
Alissa is an IFS Research Fellow and a Professor of Economics and Director of the Centre for Longitudinal Studies at the UCL Institute of Education.
Barbara Sianesi
Report details
- ISBN
- 978-1-84712-194-3
- Publisher
- Department for Work and Pensions
Suggested citation
Goodman, A and Sianesi, B. (2007). Non-participation in the Employment Retention and Advancement Study: A quantitative descriptive analysis. London: Department for Work and Pensions. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/non-participation-employment-retention-and-advancement-study-quantitative-descriptive (accessed: 23 April 2024).
Related documents
More from IFS
Understand this issue
Spring Budget 2024: What you need to know
7 March 2024
Spring Budget 2024: the Chancellor’s options
A mess has been made of Child Benefit, and the clear-up operation may not be easy
29 March 2024
Policy analysis
Recent trends in and the outlook for health-related benefits
19 April 2024
4.2 million working-age people now claiming health-related benefits, could rise by 30% by the end of the decade
19 April 2024
Recent trends in public sector pay
26 March 2024
Academic research
Labour market inequality and the changing life cycle profile of male and female wages
15 April 2024
Interpreting cohort profiles of lifecycle earnings volatility
15 April 2024
There and back again: women’s marginal commuting costs
2 April 2024