Facts and figures about UK taxes, benefits and public spending.
Income distribution, poverty and inequality.
Analysing government fiscal forecasts and tax and spending.
Analysis of the fiscal choices an independent Scotland would face.
Case studies that give a flavour of the areas where IFS research has an impact on society.
Reforming the tax system for the 21st century.
A peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing articles by academics and practitioners.
|
Type: IFS Working Papers
Volume, issue, pages: 69 pp.
ISBN: 978-1-903274-39-2 IFS member price: £10 Non-member price: £40
The TLRC Discussion Paper no. 4, єax and Accounting: A Response to the 2003 Consultation Document on Corporation Tax Reform' written by Graeme Macdonald and David Martin, supported a number of tax reforms for companies. These included the abolition of the schedular system, the abolition for most purposes of the distinction between income and capital, and the abolition of most distinctions between investment and trading companies. Another proposal was that section 42 FA 1998 should be generalised, so that all taxable profits of a company (not just Case I, Case II and Schedule A income) would be determined by reference to accounting profits, save where tax law provides otherwise. It was suggested that in this way corporation tax could be rationalised and simplified, many unjustified economic distortions could be removed, and the scope for avoidance could be reduced. It was therefore proposed that, in due course, a new Corporation Tax Act should be introduced, and that existing legislation should be reviewed to see whether it should be modified or perhaps omitted altogether in the light of closer alignment with accounts. The new Act would, of course, be drafted in accordance with the principles of the Tax Rewrite Project, but would not merely reproduce in redrafted style existing legislation unless the continued usefulness of that legislation had been established by the review. A closer alignment with accounts would be the basic policy behind the new Act. This would provide coherence, which, not surprisingly due to its aggregation over a long period without an overall review, is lacking in the ramshackle state of existing tax legislation for companies. The opportunity should also be taken to consider the scope to rationalise the tax code for companies where the issues arising are not directly related to the tax and accounting aspect. Although there is much to be done, there should be sufficient time for a review to take place before the tax rewrite team wishes to commence its work on corporation tax having finalised the remaining income tax Bills. The rewrite process could even start on those matters that have been agreed while there are still some outstanding corporation tax issues to be considered. Search |
View all IFS Working Papers in the series
Recent IFS Working Papers
Identifying the drivers of month of birth differences in educational attainment
This paper is the first to apply the principle of maximum entropy to the month of birth problem.
The drivers of month of birth differences in children's cognitive and non-cognitive skills: a regression discontinuity analysis
This paper uses data from a rich UK birth cohort to estimate the differences in cognitive and non-cognitive skills between children born at the start and end of the academic year.
The impact of age within academic year on adult outcomes
We provide the first evidence on whether differences in childhood outcomes translate into differences in the probability of employment, occupation and earnings for adults in the UK.
|


