Facts and figures about UK taxes, benefits and public spending.
Income distribution, poverty and inequality.
Analysing government fiscal forecasts and tax and spending.
Analysis of the fiscal choices an independent Scotland would face.
Case studies that give a flavour of the areas where IFS research has an impact on society.
Reforming the tax system for the 21st century.
A peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing articles by academics and practitioners.
|
Type: Journal Articles Authors: Geoffrey Maynard ISSN: Print: 0143-5671 Online: 1475-5890
Published in: Fiscal Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, May 1989
Volume, issue, pages: Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 24-28
In the run up to the recent Budget, the Chancellor and his advisors have taken a somewhat defensive position on fiscal policy. They have argued that the inflationary expansion of the UK economy during the last year or so had nothing to do with the substantial tax cuts introduced in the 1988 Budget. They point instead to the massive explosion of credit, particularly mortgage credit, which occured in this period. This, among other things, fuelled a massive rise in house prices, encouraging consumers to extract equity from their property in order to increase other forms of consumption. Moreover, the Chancellor affirms that the Government's accounts were already in surplus at the beginning of the 1988/89 fiscal year, and that this surplus increased substantially through the year: thus fiscal policy was contractionary rather than expansionary. More generally he and his advisors argue that fiscal policy is an inappropriate instrument for short run demand management which should be left to monetary policy: instead fiscal policy should be aimed at improving the supply side performance of the economy. Search |

