Facts and figures about UK taxes, benefits and public spending.
Income distribution, poverty and inequality.
Analysing government fiscal forecasts and tax and spending.
Analysis of the fiscal choices an independent Scotland would face.
Case studies that give a flavour of the areas where IFS research has an impact on society.
Reforming the tax system for the 21st century.
A peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing articles by academics and practitioners.
|
Type: Journal Articles Authors: Geoffrey Whittington ISSN: Print: 0143-5671 Online: 1475-5890
Published in: Fiscal Studies, Vol. 15, No. 4, November 1994
Volume, issue, pages: Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 88-101
Current cost accounting (CCA) was an important issue in financial accounting in the 1980s. In the UK, an accounting standard (SSAP 16, 1980) required supplementary CCA disclosures by large companies, but widespread noncompliance led to its being made non-mandatory in 1986 and completely withdrawn in 1988. The forces behind this failure were partly a decline in the rate of inflation, which made the effects of changing prices less important, and partly changes of government policy which meant that tax reliefs were not given on the basis of CCA and CCA was no longer needed as a means of justifying price increases.2 The US had a similar experience, a standard requiring CCA disclosures (FAS 33) being introduced in 1979 and withdrawn at about the same time as the UK standard. Since the withdrawal of SSAP 16, UK financial accounting has typically represented an uneasy mixture of historical costs and current values, which the Accounting Standards Board (ASB) is currently attempting to regulate (Accounting Standards Board, 1993a and 1993b). However, companies are still permitted to produce full CCA information if they so wish. In practice, the only companies that have chosen to do this are regulated utility companies. Search |

