 Facts and figures about UK taxes, benefits and public spending.
Income distribution, poverty and inequality.
Analysing government fiscal forecasts and tax and spending.
Analysis of the fiscal choices an independent Scotland would face.
Case studies that give a flavour of the areas where IFS research has an impact on society.
Reforming the tax system for the 21st century.
A peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing articles by academics and practitioners.
|
Type: Journal Articles Authors: Peter Saunders ISSN: Print: 0143-5671 Online: 1475-5890
Published in: Fiscal Studies, Vol. 16, No. 3, August 1995
Volume, issue, pages: Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 126
In my paper 'Improving work incentives in a means-tested welfare system: the 1994 Australian social security reforms' (Fiscal Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, May 1995), I stated (page 51) that 'Receipt of Partner Allowance (but not Parenting Allowance) is to be conditioned by satisfaction of the activity test' This is incorrect. The statement should in fact read as follows: 'Those persons who do not meet the eligibility criteria for Parenting Allowance or Partner Allowance will have to satisfy the conditions of eligibility for other payments. Generally, these will be Job Search Allowance, in which case the activity test will be applied'. The first nine words of the next sentence should be replaced by 'These changes will have...'. I apologise to Fiscal Studies readers for this error and for any misunderstanding it may have caused. Search |
|
|
|
© The Institute for Fiscal Studies
Limited by Guarantee,Registered in England: 954616 7 Ridgmount Street London WC1E 7AE Registered Charity: 258815 VAT no: GB 394 5830 17 Website design by Pynk and Fluffy |
||||||
