Facts and figures about UK taxes, benefits and public spending.
Income distribution, poverty and inequality.
Slides, video clips and interactive tools.
Analysing government fiscal forecasts and tax and spending.
Analysis of the fiscal choices an independent Scotland would face.
Case studies that give a flavour of the areas where IFS research has an impact on society.
Reforming the tax system for the 21st century.
A peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing articles by academics and practitioners.
Type: IFS Working Papers
Authors: Erich Battistin
Volume, issue, pages: 58 pp
JEL classification: C13, C42, D12, D91
Keywords: Consumption Inequality; Measurement Error; Permanent Income Hypothesis
This paper considers data quality issues for the analysis of consumption inequality exploiting two complementary datasets from the Consumer Expenditure Survey for the United States. The Interview sample follows survey households over four calendar quarters and consists of retrospectively asked information about monthly expenditures on durable and non-durable goods. The Diary sample interviews household for two consecutive weeks and includes detailed information about frequently purchased items (food, personal cares and household supplies). Each survey has its own questionnaire and sample. Information from one sample is exploited as an instrument for the other sample to derive a correction for the measurement error affecting observed measures of consumption inequality. Implications of our ?ndings are used as a test for the permanent income hypothesis.
View all IFS Working Papers in the series
Recent IFS Working Papers
The measurement of household consumption expenditures
We review different ways in which data on consumer expenditures can be collected or captured
Can survey participation alter household saving behavior?
We provide novel evidence of survey effects on a central life-cycle choice: household saving.