 Facts and figures about UK taxes, benefits and public spending.
Income distribution, poverty and inequality.
Analysing government fiscal forecasts and tax and spending.
Analysis of the fiscal choices an independent Scotland would face.
Case studies that give a flavour of the areas where IFS research has an impact on society.
Reforming the tax system for the 21st century.
A peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing articles by academics and practitioners.
|
Type: IFS Briefing Notes Authors: Rachel Griffith, Rupert Harrison, Jonathan Haskel and Mari Sako
Press release: Service sectors holding back UK productivity performance
The UK's poor productivity performance relative to the US has been a focus for government policy and analysis in recent Budgets and Pre-Budget Reports. US business sector labour productivity (value-added per worker) was just over 40% higher than the UK level in 2001, about the same as it was at the beginning of the 1990s. The labour productivity gap fell over the early 1990s, when the UK experienced relatively faster growth in business sector labour productivity than the US, but it has since increased again as productivity growth slowed in the UK and accelerated in the US.
This aggregate picture hides considerable variation at the industry level. In some industries the gap has narrowed substantially over the past decade, while in others it has widened. As a result, although the total size of the productivity gap did not change very much over the 1990s, the industries that account for the majority of the gap have changed considerably. An understanding of where the productivity gap arises is essential to be able to target policy effectively. Yet to date most work has considered the aggregate performance of the UK, or has focussed on the manufacturing sector despite the fact that most employment is in the service sectors.
In this briefing note we document changes in the gap over the 1990s and variations within the productivity gap in 2001.
After documenting these facts we consider some of the reasons that might explain this relatively poor performance. We then outline some of the areas that we plan to investigate over the next three years under the AIM programme. Among other issues, we plan to look at: whether the dispersion in productivity within sectors is unusually high in the UK; how productivity vary across UK regions; whether rates of entry and exit in the UK are lower than in other countries; whether outsourcing has been a significant driver of productivity growth; what the joint impact of management practices and public policies have on productivity. Search |
 View all IFS Briefing Notes in the series
Recent IFS Briefing Notes
Price-based measures to reduce alcohol consumption
This briefing note considers the effectiveness of the proposed minimum unit price of alcohol.
Better Budgets: making tax policy work
This Briefing Note discusses ways of improving the tax system.
Autumn Statement 2012: More fiscal pain to come?
This briefing not examined the outlook for the public finances in the run-up to the 2012 Autumn Statement.
|
|
|
|
© The Institute for Fiscal Studies
Limited by Guarantee,Registered in England: 954616 7 Ridgmount Street London WC1E 7AE Registered Charity: 258815 VAT no: GB 394 5830 17 Website design by Pynk and Fluffy |
||||||
